Autonomous populations with history
Can a persistent world remain coherent while thousands of situated AI actors learn, disagree, act, inherit consequences, and preserve different warranted views of the same history?
1791 works with problem domains that can independently stress the existing Palimpsestus architecture. The objective is not to force every problem into one theory; it is to discover where the same structural constraints genuinely recur and where they do not.
These are research directions, not claims of solved industry problems.
Can a persistent world remain coherent while thousands of situated AI actors learn, disagree, act, inherit consequences, and preserve different warranted views of the same history?
Can autonomous systems revise state and policy under uncertainty while preserving inspectable evidence, fault history, authority, and resource-constrained degradation?
Can provenance-bearing state transitions preserve causal partial order, distinguish current truth from inherited history, and compress safely without destroying future warrant?
Can automated decisions remain reconstructible from the exact evidence, rules, authorities, and temporal context that warranted them at the time?
Start in the domain's own language and identify the real operational constraints before introducing Palimpsestus terminology.
Pin the architecture, define strong alternatives, preregister discriminating outcomes, and separate background IP from project-specific work.
Record where the architecture helps, where existing methods are sufficient, where costs dominate, and where Palimpsestus breaks.
Useful engagements involve consequential state change, partial information, provenance, uncertainty, distributed actors, or long-lived autonomous behavior. A narrow, testable research question is better than a broad “AI transformation” project.